It may depend on exactly which dialect you're referring to. But personally as a speaker of essential General American, I would not reduce it in that way. I would produce it in one of the following ways depending on how fast I'm speaking:
[wʌts ðə ˈmæt ɚ?]
[wʌtsə ˈmæt ɚ?]
( ?? [wʌsðə ˈmæt ɚ?] )
[wʌsə ˈmæt ɚ?]
I'm sure that I could produce the 1st, 2nd and 4th forms. I'm not sure if I'd ever produce the 3rd, but maybe. I know that I would not produce a form with the voiced dental fricative and no alveolar fricative.
I also would probably at times voice the to [z]. It's hard to be sure when, but probably at least sometimes in the last variant:
[wʌzə ˈmæt ɚ?]
It's unlikely I would voice the to [z] following [t] because that's voiceless. And I also think it's unlikely I'd voice the whole sequence to [dz].