Welcome,
Guest
.
Please
login
or
register
.
News:
Frequently Asked Questions
section launched!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Linguist Forum
»
Specializations
»
Phonetics and Phonology
»
Proto-Indo-European roots
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Proto-Indo-European roots (Read 1417 times)
lingling
New Linguist
Posts: 1
Proto-Indo-European roots
«
on:
December 25, 2016, 04:38:11 AM »
I'm looking at the PIE roots in
https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/indoeurop.html
and I have some questions.
Why is "w" written in superscript in ak
w
-ā- (Water)?
What does small circle under certain letters mean in dn̥ghū- (Tongue), euə-dh-r̥ (Udder) and wl̥kwo- (Wolf)?
What does ī̆mean in lī̆no- (Flax)?
I checked their guide but it doesn't explain these things
https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/ieguide.html
.
Thanks for your help.
Logged
Daniel
Administrator
Experienced Linguist
Posts: 1663
Country:
English
Re: Proto-Indo-European roots
«
Reply #1 on:
December 25, 2016, 07:45:19 AM »
Most of your questions can be answered here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_phonology
Or maybe a little simpler here:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:About_Proto-Indo-European
The superscript w is a diacritic indicating that the consonant is labial (in this case, labiovelar). In other words, it's the "qu" sound in English, rather than a plain k.
The circle indicates a syllabic consonant (like English rhythM).
I'm not sure about the vowel, which looks like it is marking it as BOTH a short and a long vowel, according to general uses of those diacritic marks. It also cites Pokorny, whose work you can read here (in German):
https://archive.org/stream/indogermanisches02pokouoft#page/690/mode/2up
Doesn't look like there's any explanation of the orthography there, though, or in the first volume:
https://archive.org/details/indogermanisches01pokouoft
One possibility (just a guess) is that it might mean that it is EITHER short or long (either unknown, or that it varied?) -- maybe because different reflexes are found in different modern branches so it could be either one? That might be entirely wrong though.
Logged
Welcome to Linguist Forum! If you have any questions, please ask.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Linguist Forum
»
Specializations
»
Phonetics and Phonology
»
Proto-Indo-European roots