Specializations > Phonetics and Phonology

Is this words Sandhi?

(1/1)

giselberga:
Is this words Sandhi?

Example
1.France
Je + amie = j’aime
L’amore
L’Italie

2.English
I + am = i’m
You + are = you’re
Will + not = won’t

Daniel:
No.

"Sandhi... is a cover term for a wide variety of sound changes that occur at morpheme or word boundaries."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandhi

Those are just contractions. More technically, they're part of a (diachronic) cliticization process where originally independent words become attached to others as dependent morphemes, like affixes, but still somewhere between morphology and syntax.

A few of those have some kinds of sound changes ("won't" for example) that you could call "sandhi" but mostly that would be missing the overall point.

panini:
I, however, partially disagree: contractions can be a sub-type of sandhi. The matter at issue would appear to be the extent to which the phonological operations have to be "general" as opposed to having contextual restrictions. I would actually claim that the English examples are directly inflectional, in the sense that you can select between "I am" or "I'm", "will not" or "won't", and "won't" is not synchronically derived from /will+not/. French, however, would be sandhi, i.e. actual vowel deletion.

Daniel:
I suppose. But the term for the phenomenon indicated in those examples overall is not "sandhi" but "contraction" (or "cliticization"). That is, the phenomenon that those examples best illustrate.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

Go to full version