First off, I'm not a Linguist, just a layman.
Then how could you generally understand language, much less actually solve how it works? I'm not saying you need a Ph.D. to make a contribution. But your lack of qualification/experience is certainly not supporting evidence for your theory to be correct. It might be, despite that, but probably it just means it will be harder to convince you that you are wrong.
You'll notice that the individual letters form a greater Poem, which actually makes sense. The greater Poem describes both Bees and Babies, in 'forked' stories
Those two sentences juxtaposed had me laughing. Bees, babies and forks. Not sure why that would make sense. I'll leave it at that...
A *ton* of public scrutiny would be the means to check which one is correct, I suppose. Today, with all the technologies at our disposal, a 'brute force' or 'survival of the fittest' approach like this surely is feasible.
It's absurd to think that the best way to deal with a bunch of out there theories is to sort through each of them and see which holds up. Why should people spend their time on your theory in particular? And why aren't you spending all of your time reading about other theories? There are dozens if not hundreds of proposals parallel to yours out there. I've never seen one that isn't deeply flawed.
My theory will stand serious tests thrown at it and not break down.
OK. Here's one:
First, the alphabet is an inconsistent representation of English pronunciation. Surely there's no meaning difference between "color" (American spelling) and "colour" (British spelling). I flatly reject the premise of your theory based on spelling.
Secondly, sounds change over time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_changeThe alphabet has also changed if you insist on going by spelling.
Are you really claiming that meaning changes with pronunciation? That when two dialects split into different languages and the sound change, they start to mean different things? In my opinion, that is just an incoherent, uninformed argument.
If not, why is modern English today special? And again, why the alphabet?
In the end, I'm hesitant to discuss this with you. But, you posted, so I replied. And my responses are somewhat harsh because we've been through this before. The ideas of this kind of correlation just don't work (and that has been known for at least over 100 years as a fundamental principle in Linguistics, one of the only things we can all seem to agree on, and related arguments can be identified even in the writing of ancient Greek philosophers). You're welcome to look at some of the old threads here where similar proposals were discussed. The best option probably is to not waste our time arguing about something we will probably never agree on.
And, no, you didn't provide any explanation for how your proposal could be falsified. You only stated, basically, that your theory is very good, and that the others are not. That doesn't resemble an academic argument.