The paraphrase would be the same. The syntax varies, but the semantic structure does not.
For languages that have in-situ Wh-words (or for echo questions), some have argued that semantically there is "covert movement" meaning that the Wh-word is fronted semantically (post-syntactically) in order to achieve the right binding/hierarchy. It's an odd (and undesirable) solution, but the arguments make some sense, actually intuitively because of the paraphrase as you show.