Even "dictionary" on wiktionary is given without the final lax vowel: /ˈdɪkʃən(ə)ɹi/.
Good thinking on looking up that word. I suppose the freely-editable nature of the site ensures that over time things like that get corrected though, the official image isn't subject to that process though I suppose.
Oh, and I meant a bilabial approximant: [ˈβ˕iktʃinɛɹi]. I don't think I use a labio-velar/palatal [w] very often, it tends to become a simple labial.
Bilabial approximant is ʋ, the symbol you've got is for the fricative. But yeah, Finns generally conflate /v/ and /w/ into [ʋ].
I'm fine with it following a British pronunciation, but the final lax vowel is curious - does any dialect say it this way? Hmm... perhaps it's RP? If I tryto mimic talking 'with a plum in my mouth' it does come across rather lax...
The stress patterning is definitely RP-esque, but I can't imagine any well-attested dialect of English allowing lax vowels in open syllables, that seems to be a pretty pervasive constraint. When I say it to myself it just sounds weird and non native.
EDIT:
Even the entry for
Wiktionary (yes, there is one) reflects the "proper" pronunciations. All three (UK, US, and Canada) have a final tense vowel. I think it's about time they correct their image.
