Linguist Forum

Specializations => Phonetics and Phonology => Topic started by: ibarrere on January 26, 2014, 06:13:08 AM

Title: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: ibarrere on January 26, 2014, 06:13:08 AM
I use Wiktionary all the time for a variety of things, it's a really great website. The one thing that bothers me though is the logo in the upper left:

(https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-prn1/c61.61.760.760/s160x160/45304_359095844202723_667045659_n.png)

The transcription is ['wɪkʃənrɪ]. Not only am I peeved because the transcription follows another dialect than mine, but I was also under the impression that lax vowels (such as ɪ) can't occur in open syllables (like the word-final one) in any English dialects. Saying that word with a lax vowel word-finally sounds weird and non native. What gives?
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: freknu on January 26, 2014, 06:35:19 AM
I'm not a native English speaker, but for some reason I always think of it as /ˈβiktʃineɹi/ — the more prominant differences being a vowel between /n/ and /ɹ/, and the affricative cluster /ktʃ/ rather than /kʃ/.

It probably has a lot of variation even among native speakers.
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: ibarrere on January 26, 2014, 07:22:53 AM
Yeah, it certainly has a lot of variation. My particular pronunciation (from Seattle) is something like [wɪkʃɨneɪɹi]. I'm not sure I've heard it with a bilabial fricative as the first phone (or that I've heard anybody actually say the word out loud at all...), but that could be a regional thing as well.

Considering the legitimate variation, my main gripe is with the word-final lax vowel.
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: freknu on January 26, 2014, 07:25:02 AM
Even "dictionary" on wiktionary is given without the final lax vowel: /ˈdɪkʃən(ə)ɹi/.

(EDIT)

Oh, and I meant a bilabial approximant: [ˈβ˕iktʃinɛɹi]. I don't think I use a labio-velar/palatal [w] very often, it tends to become a simple labial.
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: Corybobory on January 26, 2014, 07:52:47 AM
I'm fine with it following a British pronunciation, but the final lax vowel is curious - does any dialect say it this way? Hmm... perhaps it's RP?  If I tryto mimic talking 'with a plum in my mouth' it does come across rather lax...
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: ibarrere on January 26, 2014, 09:18:55 AM
Even "dictionary" on wiktionary is given without the final lax vowel: /ˈdɪkʃən(ə)ɹi/.

Good thinking on looking up that word. I suppose the freely-editable nature of the site ensures that over time things like that get corrected though, the official image isn't subject to that process though I suppose.

Quote from: freknu
Oh, and I meant a bilabial approximant: [ˈβ˕iktʃinɛɹi]. I don't think I use a labio-velar/palatal [w] very often, it tends to become a simple labial.

Bilabial approximant is ʋ, the symbol you've got is for the fricative. But yeah, Finns generally conflate /v/ and /w/ into [ʋ].

Quote from: Corybobory
I'm fine with it following a British pronunciation, but the final lax vowel is curious - does any dialect say it this way? Hmm... perhaps it's RP?  If I tryto mimic talking 'with a plum in my mouth' it does come across rather lax...

The stress patterning is definitely RP-esque, but I can't imagine any well-attested dialect of English allowing lax vowels in open syllables, that seems to be a pretty pervasive constraint. When I say it to myself it just sounds weird and non native.

EDIT:

Even the entry for Wiktionary (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary) (yes, there is one) reflects the "proper" pronunciations. All three (UK, US, and Canada) have a final tense vowel. I think it's about time they correct their image. :)
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: freknu on January 26, 2014, 09:23:48 AM
Bilabial approximant is ʋ, the symbol you've got is for the fricative.

Eh? [β] = bilabial spirant~approximant, [ʋ] = labiodental approximant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPA)

But yeah, Finns generally conflate /v/ and /w/ into [ʋ].

I'm Norse ;) Unless you meant "Finn" as in citizen of Finland, lol.
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: ibarrere on January 26, 2014, 09:34:12 AM

Eh? [β] = bilabial spirant~approximant, [ʋ] = labiodental approximant.

Oh right, ʋ is labiodental. I always think of β as solely a fricative, but I suppose it could be classified as an approximant as well since there isn't a symbol for that. My bad, causing confusion.

Quote from: freknu
I'm Norse ;) Unless you meant "Finn" as in citizen of Finland, lol.

Wasn't sure about your native language, I just saw the Finnish flag. Either way, I guess it's the same case for anybody whose native language doesn't contrast /v/ and /w/.

For what it's worth, I added an entry to the discussion page for the wiktionary entry regarding the logo. We'll see what that accomplishes. :)
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: freknu on January 26, 2014, 09:36:30 AM
Hopefully something will happen.
Title: Re: IPA transcription of Wiktionary
Post by: ibarrere on June 11, 2014, 11:14:06 AM
Today I learned that this transcription is, in fact, RP. The process is called "happy laxing", and is described in brief here:

http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/the-demise-of-happy-laxing/